Control… Be leaner…control…don’t spend… don’t invest… cut costs… reduce headcount… raise the bar… demand more for less… control… leaner… strip investment… work harder… more for less… cut… thin… starve… control
I can talk about anorexia, I have experienced it, seen it in my own family and can fully empathise with the terror, pain and emotional turmoil that it brings. The NHS describes Anorexia as
“Anorexia nervosa is an eating disorder and a serious mental health condition. People with anorexia have problems with eating. They are very anxious about their weight and keep it as low as possible by strictly controlling and limiting what they eat. Many people with anorexia will also exercise excessively to lose weight… Even when a person with anorexia becomes extremely underweight, they still feel compelled to lose more weight. Though people with anorexia avoid eating food whenever they can, they also develop an obsession with eating and diet. For example, they may obsessively count the calories in different types of foods even though they have no intention of eating it.”
Anorexia is about control, and obsessively measuring, and restricting input an anorexic business behaves the same way:
- Eats less – spends less in an effort to improve the bottom line
- Exercises More – sheds fat out of the system by reducing headcount and demanding more performance
- Measures every calorie – micro measure spend – objective to reduce the cost of running the business
Since the early 90’s we saw the rise of power in the financial functions within organisations. Finance became the power in the Boardroom, and as a consequence we saw the advent of the performance culture. The performance culture focuses on ‘controlling’ and ‘measuring’ spend (eating, performance and measures) in an attempt to improve the bottom line. The Accountants model of the world is to look at spend, cut it to a bare minimum, reduce ‘fat’ in the system, and raise the bar of performance. The battle cry in a company that operates with a Performance Culture is ‘We want more for less!’ and less generally means less cost; less cost has been achieved by employing less people and controlling spend to an obsessive level. Year on year our businesses have been starved of the very things that would make them thrive.
Over the years, we have seen the culling of people from organisations, in an effort to reduce fat in the system and improve the bottom line – a short-term strategy with long-term negative impact. In reality, they may have stripped out headcount, but they forgot to strip out work; in fact, they added to the workload by demanding higher returns year on year. To meet the demands of workload and increased targets, we work longer hours. In fact, we work 46% longer hours in the UK and are 27% less productive because of it! Our people are working in Dickensian sweat-shops that demand complete dedication (in terms of hours) to work. Increased workload and the long-hours culture, has led to increased stress, increased introspection, reduced worklife balance, increased sickness absence, reduced innovation, reduced investment in training and coaching and reduced customer service.
The Financier, whilst good at counting and measuring, is often not good at recognising the human and long-term impact of his anorexic business model. The FD model of the world has not worked and the business climate reflects that, these people should NOT be in charge or in control of your business! Accountants are brilliant at counting and that is what they should be used for! They should never CONTROL your business and its strategies and models. Your business has been starved, and there are many anorexic businesses today; businesses that control investment to a point where they are starved of innovation, creativity, collaboration, fun, teamwork, and balance. Smart companies like Apple and Virgin never let the power sit with the bean counters, in Branson’s and Jobs’ books, they both talk about never letting the financiers starve their business of the investment in innovation and people. Simply stated, when business is about controlling spend or people, it can become anorexic. It bases all of its future decisions on past performance and results. Just like a person would control their intake of food because they ate a little too much yesterday, or feel too fat for what they ate last week, the financier looks backward and bases all decisions for the future on past results.
There is an alternative, there is a healthier way to be, and the anorexic business must begin with the recognition that it is not well, and that the demons that control it do not want it to be well. Then, day by day, with the right kind of investment, the right kind of nurture, these businesses can once again become healthy, full of vitality, balanced, lean but energetic, intelligent and fun, making smart choices, made by smart people who are engaged. This comes from balancing profits with people; nothing new there you may think, but there is, if you use an integrated culture approach.
The implications for HR, OD, L&D and Diversity Managers are huge, but those willing to move towards the Integrated Culture should reap the business results as well as the people engagement. This suggests that performance management systems, career development processes, working patterns and organisational design should all be changed to suit a more blended approach to suit today’s workplaces and business needs.
The Conclusion
For organisations to be healthy, they must:
- Balance control with nurture
- Build a long-term self-sustaining organisation that will go on and on beyond themselves
- Focus on making a difference, not just making money
- Create environments, behaviours, abilities and beliefs that focus on the long-term development (potential), motivation, belonging and relationships of people in their organisation and wider community
- Be ‘we’ not ‘I’ focused, using collaborative behaviours to build the community.
- Hire for values and attitude, not skills and competencies
- Balanced power model to run the business
- Reduce the power of the financial focus
Of course, firing the financiers is totally optional!
Integrated Leadership is now the topic of Lynne’s next book, and is supported in business consulting, speaking, coaching & training.


ss cost and less life. The 20th century workplace finds it hard to implement flexible working, because it wants rules, controls and boundaries. It stifles innovation and choice. In this workplace, people feel that they have no choice but to put in the hours. In this environment flexible working becomes exclusive: for mums, but not for managers. For carers and people with disabilities, but not men. Men want flexible working too, but only 4% feel that they can ask for it! It may be available in this company as a Policy document, but the reality is that for many, it is a career decision to ask for it. Instead, we witness increased hours, increased presenteeism, reduced worklife balance, increased sickness absence, increased attrition of women, increased stress, reduced innovation and increased cost. It is time that we retired the 20th Century Management Practice, once and for all!













